A truck driver was dismissed after his employer
discovered that he had falsified his logbooks and timesheets, and had failed to
take breaks as required by the company’s health and safety policies.
The Employment Relations Authority rejected the
employee’s personal grievance claim for unjustified dismissal.
The ERA held that the employer had a
substantial justification for finding that the employee had committed serious
misconduct as he was part of the Health and Safety Committee and knew of the
company’s health and safety policies concerning breaks. The employee also
acknowledged that he was aware of the company’s policies, procedures and
expectations and knew that if he breached those he could face disciplinary
action. The employee understood that failure to observe safety rules and the
falsification of documents, constituted serious misconduct under his Collective
Agreement.
The ERA held that the employer carried out a
full and fair investigation. The employee had been provided with all the
relevant information to his case and had been advised of all of the allegations
against him and the possible outcomes of the disciplinary process. The employee
was represented by union delegates at disciplinary meetings, which were postponed
when the employee became unwell. The employer gave the employee the opportunity
to respond to the allegations and genuinely considered his explanations before
making his decision.
Alan Knowsley
Employment Lawyer Wellington
Employment Lawyer Wellington
No comments:
Post a Comment