An employee who worked as an
office and sales administrator resigned after reporting incidents of bullying
and intimidation by her employers. The employee believed that one of her
employers was embezzling money from the business and so implemented a cash
handling system, which caused a lot of resentment and tension to arise between them.
The employee was then hospitalised due to work stress and did not return to
work.
The ERA upheld the employee’s personal
grievance claim that she had been unjustifiably constructively dismissed but
rejected that she had been disadvantaged in her employment because she had not received
sick leave. This was because she had been working for the company for less than
six months and was not contractually entitled to sick pay.
The ERA held that the employers failed
to provide the employee with a safe working environment which caused her stress,
and led to her ill health and resignation.
The ERA found that stress arose
because of the tense relationship between her employers whom she had to work
with on a daily basis, and because of the health issues of one of her employers
who would yell at her from a different room due to not being fully mobile.
The ERA held that no formal steps
were taken when the employee raised issues of bullying and intimidation in the
workplace and nothing was done to address the animosity between her other employer
when she accused her of embezzlement.
The ERA held that the employer’s
breach was of sufficient seriousness to render the employee’s resignation
reasonably foreseeable.
The ERA awarded over three months
lost wages plus $10,000 compensation for hurt and humiliation.
Alan Knowsley
Employment Lawyer Wellington
Employment Lawyer Wellington
No comments:
Post a Comment