The
Employment Relations Authority has fined an employer after it treated one of
its employees as a contractor.
Following
the resulting disagreement, the employee refused to return to work and raised a
personal grievance for unjust constructive dismissal. This resulted in fines
for unpaid KiwiSaver, holiday pay, sick pay, hurt and humiliation, and a
general penalty. This totalled over $19,700.
The
young man met the employer as a connection through his father, and was taken on
as a general labourer. During this time the employee began an apprenticeship
under the employer.
After
10 months, the employee’s father contacted the employer demanding payslips, and
an employment agreement, as one had never been provided to the employee.
After
the employer agreed to provide the documents and failed to follow through, the
employee refused to return to work and engaged a solicitor.
The Authority
applied a test in order to determine whether an individual is a contractor or
employee. This test comprises consideration as to the parties’ intentions,
degree of employer control over the individual, and who pays the taxes during
the work engagement.
The
ultimate decision was that the employee was not a contractor, and by breaching
their employment agreement terms by paying incorrectly, and failing to provide
payslips or formal employment agreement, the dismissal was considered constructive
and unjustified.
It is
important when entering an employment arrangement to understand what capacity an
individual is employing, or being employed, in.
Awareness
around the different rights and obligations between contractors and employees
are also vital. Individuals experienced in employment should be consulted to
avoid ambiguity and potentially costly mistakes.
Alan Knowsley
Employment Lawyer
Wellington
No comments:
Post a Comment