The ERA
held that the two girls were part-time employees and by removing all of their
hours the employer effectively dismissed them. The ERA noted that the employer failed to act
as a fair and reasonable employer could in the circumstances by failing to follow
a proper process. The ERA held that this process was also required in a
redundancy situation and the business size and lack of resources was not a
valid excuse for failing to implement one.
Another
employee’s personal grievance claim for constructive dismissal was rejected by
the ERA. The employee complained to the ERA about the employer’s language and
behaviour. The ERA held that the employer’s conduct was no more than
inconsiderate and noted that the employee failed to raise an issue with the
employer’s alleged, inappropriate language and behaviour before they resigned.
Consequently, the ERA held that it was impossible for the employer to have
foreseen her resignation or done anything to prevent it.
The ERA
awarded one employee $910 for lost wages plus $1,500 compensation for
humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings. The other employee was
awarded over $2,900 for lost wages plus $1,500 compensation.
Alan
Knowsley
Employment Lawyer Wellington
Employment Lawyer Wellington
No comments:
Post a Comment