The Employment Relations Authority has held an employer’s
deductions from wages and final holiday pay to be unlawful and has ordered the
amounts withheld to be paid to the employee.
The employee resigned without giving the required period
of notice and the employer withheld money in accordance with clauses in the
Employment Agreement permitting the withholding of money if the required notice
period was not given.
The Employment Relations Authority held that a general
withholding clause, such as in this agreement, could be lawful but, before any
deduction is made there has to be consultation with the employee and the amount
of any deduction has to be reasonable.
In this case there was neither consultation, nor a reasonable deduction.
The ERA also held that an employer cannot use a general
deduction clause to withhold money for claims related to lack of notice and any
loss caused by that lack of notice. It
held that such clauses can only be used for claims where the amount is clear,
for example, if there had been a loan to the employee or an advance of wages or
similar.
The ERA also held that a clause that sets the amount of
damage for the no notice period as equivalent to wages for that notice period,
is a penalty clause, rather than a genuine pre-estimate of damage, and is
therefore unenforceable.
If an employer wants to withhold wages for money owing or
damage caused by lack of notice, it needs to consult with the employee and
obtain a specific agreement to the withholding of those wages (unless there has
been a clear agreement by the employee for repayment of an advance of wages or
similar).
Alan
Knowsley
Employment
Lawyer Wellington
No comments:
Post a Comment