The manager of a day care centre accused one of
her employees of turning up to work “stoned” several times. After her concerns
were raised with the employee, who had been sent home after appearing to be
under the influence of drugs, the manager decided to hold an emergency meeting
at which, she said the employee appeared to be “totally stoned out of her
brains”.
The former employee has raised personal
grievance claims against her employer after the accusations of drug, use which
she claimed disadvantaged her in the workplace. She also claims her resignation
was a constructive dismissal on the part of the employer.
The Employment Relations Authority found that a
fair and reasonable employer could carry out a discrete and separate
investigation into the allegations before action was taken. This could have
included interviews with other staff members, for example. This information
could have been used to have a more accurate and fair account of whether the
employee had been under the influence of drugs, even though it was the genuine
belief of the manager.
The ERA found that the allegations became known
in the work place and disadvantaged the employee in her employment
considerably.
In terms of the constructive dismissal, the ERA
could not find evidence that the employer had forced her resignation.
The ERA awarded the employee $2,000
compensation, this was because the employer did not carry out a fair and
reasonable investigation and disciplinary process and this caused hurt and
humiliation. No lost wages were awarded as the employee resigned and was not
dismissed.
Alan Knowsley
Employment Lawyer Wellington
Employment Lawyer Wellington
No comments:
Post a Comment