The ERA held that they had no jurisdiction to consider the
contractor’s claim as he was not employed by the director of the company.
The ERA found that the director of the company told the
contractor that she did not want him to be an employee and he agreed to
undertake the work on that basis. The contractor also issued invoices and
claimed GST from them, made personal income from two properties which he was
responsible for, and was aware that the director was not paying tax on his
behalf.
Alan Knowsley
No comments:
Post a Comment