The employee was suspended and then dismissed
following a meeting with the other directors and shareholders, and took a
personal grievance for unjustified dismissal and unlawful suspension.
The Employment Relations Authority found that the
suspension was done without a proper process as the employee had no opportunity
to comment on the suspension before it was imposed.
The ERA also found that there was no evidence to
support any of the allegations as misconduct, let alone serious misconduct
justifying dismissal.
In addition the employer carried out the disciplinary
process by stealth. It did not advise
the employee of the real purpose of the meeting, nor what the allegations were
in advance (so she could not prepare).
It did not give her an opportunity to have a support person, and did not
give her any of the documentation upon which it relied.
The employer also told the other employees (before it
had reached a decision on the allegations) that the employee “had done very bad
things” and would not be returning.
The ERA held this to be gross predetermination of the
issues and a complete failure of any proper process, describing the employer’s
actions as “cavalier”.
The ERA order compensation of $15,000, lost wages of
$31,833, wage arrears of $6,500 and costs of $5,890 (totalling more than $59,000).
The employee may not see any of this money as the
business is no longer trading and is said by her other family members to be
insolvent.
If you need help getting your disciplinary
investigations right give me a call on 04 473 6850.
Alan Knowsley
No comments:
Post a Comment